Introduction :
The
major KM activities described in the KM cycle in the previous material must
have a conceptual framework to
operate within, otherwise the activities will not be coordinated and will not
produce the expected KM benefit.
Davenport
and Prusak
(1998) refer to the distinctions among data, information, and knowledge as
operational and argue that we can transform
information into knowledge by means of comparison,
consequences, connections and conversation.
The Nonaka and Takeuchi Knowledge Spiral Model (SECI Model)
Background
Nonaka and
Takeuchi (1995) studied how Japanese companies were successful in achieving
creativity and innovation.
The
tacit/explicit spectrum of knowledge forms (the epistemological dimension) and
the individual/group/organizational) or three-tier model of knowledge and
diffusion (the ontological dimension) are both needed in order to create knowledge and produce innovation.
According
to Takeuchi and Nonaka, there
are four modes of knowledge conversion :
1. From tacit knowledge to tacit
knowledge: the process of socialization.
2. From tacit knowledge to explicit
knowledge: the process of externalization.
3. From explicit knowledge to
explicit knowledge: the process of combination.
4. From explicit knowledge to tacit
knowledge: the process of internalization.
•Socialization (tacit-to-tacit)
consists of the sharing of knowledge in face-to-face natural, and typically
social interactions.
•Socialization
is among the easiest forms of
exchanging knowledge, because it is what we do instinctively when we gather at
the coffee machine or meeting.
•The
greatest advantage of socialization is also its greatest drawback:
because knowledge remains tacit, it
is rarely captured, noted, or written down anywhere.
•Externalization (tacit-to-explicit)
is a process that gives a visible form to tacit knowledge and converts it to
explicit knowledge.
•Knowledge
that was previously tacit can somehow be written
down, recorded, drawn, or made tangible or concrete in some
manner.
•Once
externalized, knowledge is now tangible
and permanent. It
can be shared more easily with others and leveraged throughout the
organization.
•Combination (explicit-to-explicit)
is the process of recombining discrete piece of explicit knowledge into a new
form.
•Internalization (explicit-to-tacit)
occurs through the diffusion and embedding of newly acquired behavior and newly
understood or revised mental models.
•Internalization
is very strongly linked to “learning
by doing.”
•Once
new knowledge has been internalized, it is then used by
employees who broaden it, extend it and reframe it within their own existing
tacit knowledge bases.
Inukshuk KM Model
•The inukshuk KM model (Girard, 2005) was developed to help Canadian government departments to better manage their knowledge.
•This model was developed by both reviewing existing major models to extract five key enablers (technology, leadership, culture, measurement, and process) and by conducting quantitative research to validate these enablers.
The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) KM Model
Inukshuk KM Model
•The inukshuk KM model (Girard, 2005) was developed to help Canadian government departments to better manage their knowledge.
•This model was developed by both reviewing existing major models to extract five key enablers (technology, leadership, culture, measurement, and process) and by conducting quantitative research to validate these enablers.
The European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) KM Model
•The
EFQM model (Bhatt 2000, 2001, 2002) looks at the way in which knowledge
management is used to attain the
goals of an organization.
•This
model is based on traditional models of quality and excellence, so there are
very strong links between KM
processes and expected organizational results.
The Wiig
Model for Building and Using Knowledge
Wiig
(1993) approached his KM model with the following principle: in order for
knowledge to be useful and valuable, it must be organized.
Some useful dimensions to
consider in Wiig’s KM model include:
1. Completeness
2. Connectedness
3. Congruency
4. Perspective and purpose
2. Connectedness
3. Congruency
4. Perspective and purpose
Wiig’s
approach can be seen as a further refinement of the fourth Nonaka and Takeuching
quadrant of internalization.
Wiig
(1993) also defines three forms of knowledge:
1.Public knowledge is
explicit, taught and routinely shared knowledge that is generally available in
the public domain (e.g., a published book or information on a web site)
2.Shared expertise is
proprietary knowledge assets that are exclusively held by knowledge workers and
shared in their work or embedded in technology.
3.Personal knowledge is
typically more tacit than explicit knowledge, and is used unconsciously in
work, play and daily life
In
addition to the three major forms of knowledge, Wiig
(1993) also defines four types of knowledge:
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar